US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 7,572
Deas v. Atkinson et al
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff: Deandrae Deas
Defendant: Kenneth Atkinson, Trevor Smith, Scott Colvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gorbey v. Doe et al
as 6:2024cv00072
Plaintiff: Michael S. Gorbey, Tsunami Khan and Chief Michael S. Gorbey
Defendant: John or Jane Doe, Mr. Stoval, Tony Shult and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
England v. USA
as 6:2024cv00071
Petitioner: Robert Christopher England
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
White v. Miller et al
as 0:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Dcorya White
Defendant: Dr. Lisa Miller, Amanda Web, Jessica Cogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. USA et al
as 0:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: Glenn Miller
Defendant: USA, Officer Hunt and Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bixler v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Danny Ray Bixler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00135
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: James Steven Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff: Michael Thornton
Defendant: Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Campbell County 17th District Court
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff: Gerald Nugget Williams
Defendant: Campbell County 17th District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Velasquez-Gomez v. USA
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner: Mario Velasquez-Gomez
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?