Baker v. Bell County Forestry Camp et al
| Glenn Sam Baker |
| Leamon Partin, Bell County Forestry Camp, Brandy Harm, Thresa P. Sinclair, Jeb Mason, Lamm Baker and Gwen Vance |
| 6:2024cv00036 |
| March 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Gregory F VanTatenhove |
| Prisoner Petitions (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(JCP) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Glenn Sam Baker, pro se. (JCP) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Glenn Sam Baker, pro se. Motions referred to P SO. (JCP) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT referred to PSO, filed by Glenn Sam Baker, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope Post Marked 03.13.2024, #2 Cover Letter)(JCP) Modified added pro se to text on 3/18/2024 (JCP). |
| Conflict Check run. (JCP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
