Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,279
Jackson v. Arnold
as 1:2024cv00096
Respondent:
Jailer (TN) Klint Arnold
Petitioner:
Matthew M. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perryman v. Warden, FCI Ashland
as 0:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Michael Perryman
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Ashland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McQuiston v. Lovett
as 6:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
Dale Conrad McQuiston
Respondent:
Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ricks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00045
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Keith Ricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00100
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Adam Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wright v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Wright
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, Warden, USP McCreary and Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knutson v. Levitt/Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Todd Seaver Knutson
Respondent:
Warden Levitt/Gilley, SiS Lt. Smith, SiS Tech Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. McKenzie
as 5:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Joseph Williams
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. McKenzie
as 0:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
Joseph Williams
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. McKenzie
as 3:2024cv00376
Petitioner:
Dante' Corvette Stone
Respondent:
Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
