U.S. District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,164
Johnson v. Butrum
as 3:2025cv00354
Petitioner:
Trevor Johnson
Respondent:
Shannon Butrum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cruz v. Tindell et al
as 3:2025cv00345
Petitioner:
Ezequiel Moreno Cruz
Defendant:
Jailer Jeff Tindell, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alarcon v. Tindell et al
as 3:2025cv00348
Petitioner:
Rubi Chavez Alarcon
Respondent:
Jailer Jeff Tindell, Todd M. Lyons, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luna v. Lane et al
as 5:2025cv00074
Petitioner:
George A. Luna
Respondent:
Tim Lane and Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Soll v. Brewer
as 3:2025cv00304
Petitioner:
Henry Soll
Respondent:
Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Riley v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2025cv00041
Petitioner:
Justin S. Riley
Respondent:
Daviess County Detention Center and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grimes v. Stack
as 3:2025cv00259
Petitioner:
Rodney M. Grimes
Respondent:
Jesse Stack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cope v. Plappert
as 3:2025cv00258
Petitioner:
William Douglas Cope, Jr.
Defendant:
Hon. Ms. Laura Plappert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Collins v. Valentine
as 3:2025cv00252
Petitioner:
Floyd Collins, Jr.
Respondent:
Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Torrence v. Plappert
as 3:2025cv00237
Petitioner:
Michael Torrence
Respondent:
Laura Plappert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
