US District Court for the Western District of Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,076
Rudometkin v. Commanding General
as 3:2022cv00497
Petitioner:
David J. Rudometkin
Defendant:
Commanding General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dennison v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2022cv00482
Petitioner:
Michael Dennison
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carroll v. Hendricks et al
as 1:2022cv00121
Petitioner:
Brandon Carroll
Respondent:
Judge Hendricks, Jailer Pennick, Logan County Circuit Court, Ky and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Middleton v. Commonwealth Public Advocacy's Office
as 5:2022cv00121
Plaintiff:
Brenda Middleton
Defendant:
Commonwealth Public Advocacy's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Robey
as 5:2022cv00116
Petitioner:
Jeth Nelson
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaballah v. McKenzie
as 3:2022cv00464
Petitioner:
Conrai Andre Kaballah
Respondent:
Warden Shawn McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carpenter v. Robey
as 1:2022cv00104
Petitioner:
Jeffery Carpenter
Respondent:
Warden Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stone v. Underwood
as 1:2022cv00102
Petitioner:
Jackie Wayne Stone
Respondent:
Doc Jamie Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Mazza
as 5:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Timothy Wayne Robinson
Respondent:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nix v. Mazza
as 3:2022cv00407
Petitioner:
Shelby Joe Nix
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
