Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 4,421
RSS Feed | View as table
George v. Lovett
as 6:2025cv00068
Petitioner: Romancee George
Respondent: S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Quisenberry v. Valentine
as 3:2025cv00215
Petitioner: Terri T. Quisenberry
Respondent: Anna Valentine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Heiting v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2025cv00123
Petitioner: Kevin Christopher Heiting
Respondent: David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whelan v. Krow
as 0:2025cv00046
Petitioner: Anthony B. Whelan
Respondent: Ivan Krow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard v. Warden FCI Manchester
as 6:2025cv00064
Petitioner: Derrick Howard
Respondent: Warden FCI Manchester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Walker v. Warden, FMC Lexington
as 5:2025cv00120
Petitioner: Taron Develle Walker
Respondent: Warden, FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rutledge v. BOP
as 6:2025cv00059
Petitioner: David Rutledge
Respondent: BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Posey, SR. v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2025cv00111
Petitioner: Bart Sidney Posey, SR.
Respondent: David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rayner v. FMC Lexington
as 5:2025cv00113
Petitioner: Jaime Rayner
Respondent: FMC Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fortson v. Entzel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2025cv00043
Petitioner: Durrell Fortson
Respondent: Warden Christopher Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?