Kentucky Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 4,256
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner: John Raymond Ast
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Hughes
as 3:2024cv00062
Petitioner: Kenneth W. Brown
Respondent: Craig Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner: Anthony D. Taylor
Respondent: John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Coffman v. Roby
as 3:2024cv00053
Petitioner: Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent: Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCullum v. Green
as 3:2024cv00046
Petitioner: Christopher McCullum
Respondent: J. David Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00044
Petitioner: Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent: Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pierce v. LeMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner: David L. Pierce
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Couch v. Akers
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff: Alastair Couch
Defendant: Daniel Akers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?