Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
Cecil Bennett |
Commonwealth Kentucky |
2:2024cv00014 |
January 23, 2024 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
Edward B Atkins |
Hanly A Ingram |
Robert E Wier |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Letter from Cecil Bennett- Copy of Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 3-15-2024) (TDB) |
Filing 9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing fee received - $ 5.00, receipt number 200001341. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope PM 2-20-2024) (SLG) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Edward B. Atkins for review: #9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Filing Fee Received. (SLG) |
Filing 8 ORDER: that Bennett shall file a supplemental petition including additional facts supporting each ground of relief on or before March 8, 2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins on 2/16/2024.(TDB)cc: COR and Cecil Bennett by US Mail |
Filing 6 ORDER: in accordance with paragraph 8 of General Order 23-10, this matter is REASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 2/12/2024.(TDB)cc: COR and Cecil Bennett by US Mail |
Filing 5 ORDER: Bennett SHALL promptly submit the $5 filing fee so the Court may process his petition. Signed by Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram on 2/9/2024.(TDB)cc: COR and Cecil Bennett by US Mail |
Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Cecil Bennett, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Envelope PM 2/6/2024)(TDB) |
Filing 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption Page)(TDB) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Cecil Bennett, pro se. (Attachments: #1 AO 240-Not filled out, #2 Envelope PM 1/17/2024)(TDB) |
Conflict Check run. (TDB) |
CLERK'S VIRTUAL NOTICE as to Cecil Bennett re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus : Petitioner incorrectly made check ($5 filing fee) out to "Superior Court", check was mailed back to petitioner with instructions to make check out to United States District Court. cc: Cecil Bennett by US Mail (TDB) |
***FILE SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of Hanly A. Ingram for review: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (TDB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.