Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
| John Raymond Ast |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons |
| 7:2024cv00012 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky |
| P SO |
| Robert E Wier |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 JUDGMENT: 1. Petitioner John Raymond Ast's petition for a writ of habeas corpus (DE #1 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and 2. This action is STRICKEN from Court's active docket. Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 4/1/2024. (TDA) cc: John Ast by US Mail |
Filing 8
SEALED ORDER re #1 , #3 , #4 & #6 . Signed by Judge Robert E. Wier on 4/1/2024. (TDA)cc: John Ast w/ forms by US Mail, Env Marked
|
| Filing 7 IMPORTANT NOTICE to Pro Se Filer: Information relating to pro se filings and F.R.Civ.P. 5.2 requiring personal identifiers be partially redacted from documents filed with the court. #Click here for more information on the rules. It is the sole responsibility of counsel and the parties to comply with the rules requiring redaction of personal data identifiers.cc: pro se filer via U.S. Mail (Attachments: #1 Sample Caption)(RCB) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John Raymond Ast, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit - Financial Affidavit, #2 Envelope pm 1/29/2024) (RCB) |
| Filing 5 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by John Raymond Ast, pro se. (RCB) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Raymond Ast, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Envelope pm 1/29/2024)(RCB) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Protective Order to Seal This Motion with Petitioner's 2241 Motion and Filings by John Raymond Ast, pro se. Motions referred to PSO. (Attachments: #1 Envelope pm 1/29/2024)(RCB) Modified to SEAL on 4/1/2024 per Order #8. (TDA). |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by John Raymond Ast, pro se. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit 1-A - DC Opinion & Order, #3 Exhibit A - Administrative Remedy, #4 Cover Letter, #5 Envelope pm 1/29/2024)(RCB) Modified to SEAL on 4/1/2024 per Order #8. (TDA). |
| Conflict Check run. (RCB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #3 MOTION for Protective Order to Seal This Motion with Petitioner's 2241 Motion and Filings by John Raymond Ast (RCB) |
| ***MOTION SUBMITTED TO CHAMBERS of PSO for review: re #4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by John Raymond Ast, #6 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by John Raymond Ast (RCB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Kentucky Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: John Raymond Ast | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
