New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,022
Stinson v. Lopez et al
as 1:2025cv00856
Plaintiff:
Richard A. Stinson
Defendant:
Officer J. Lopez and Lt. Motska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominy v. United States of America
as 1:2025cv01279
Plaintiff:
Vincent M. Dominy
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Orange County Jail

as 1:2025cv01227
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Price
Defendant:
Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woodhouse v. Bosely et al

as 1:2025cv01229
Plaintiff:
Darri D. Woodhouse
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Bosely and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. New York City et al

as 1:2025cv01246
Plaintiff:
Jamel Washington
Defendant:
New York City, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. EMTC Rikers Island

as 1:2025cv01154
Plaintiff:
Qaaim Baker
Defendant:
EMTC Rikers Island
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Orange County Jail
as 1:2025cv01024
Plaintiff:
Nicholas J. Price
Defendant:
Orange County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guggino v. Medical Department-Yaphank Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2025cv00597
Plaintiff:
Luke Guggino
Defendant:
Medical Department-Yaphank Correctional Facility and Suffolk County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reyes v. Sixth Precinct et al
as 2:2025cv00626
Plaintiff:
James J. Reyes
Defendant:
Sixth Precinct, John doe Detective # 1, Town of Brookhaven and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. John Doe et al

as 1:2025cv00920
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wilson
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.