North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,457
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Defendant:
FNU Harrison, FNU Baker, FNU Church and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Johnston County et al
as 5:2024ct03179
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bey and Antonio Moss
Defendant:
Johnston County, Johnston County Detention Center and North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Washington et al
as 5:2024ct03177
Defendant:
Inmate Medical Services, Captain Washington and Kenny Shepard
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robert Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mooney v. Harrison et al
as 5:2024ct03178
Defendant:
Warden Parker, Officer Chapelle, Officer Baker and others
Plaintiff:
Rufus M. Mooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACK v. HACKETT
as 1:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
JAMES DAMION MACK
Defendant:
MR. HACKETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Bullard et al
as 5:2024ct03173
Defendant:
Kimberly D. Grande, Jamie Bullard, Joshua H. Stein and others
Plaintiff:
Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El and Carlos Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cabrera v. Ware
as 5:2024ct03174
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Cabrera
Defendant:
Officer Ware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Murphy v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03175
Plaintiff:
Aviyon Murphy
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Lenoir County Sheriff
as 5:2024ct03176
Defendant:
Lenoir County Sheriff
Plaintiff:
Lionel Keys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Burke County Sheriff's Department Detention Center-Jail et al
as 1:2024cv00191
Defendant:
FNU Beaver, FNU Robinson, John/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Solomon D. Norwood and Abdullah Raheem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
