U.S. District Court for the District of Guam
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,175
Card v. Oaks
as 1:2025cv00010
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Lloyd D Oaks
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Kiesel
as 1:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Diana L. Kiesel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Sorenson
as 1:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Philip K. Sorenson
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
Card v. Henderson
as 1:2025cv00013
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Clarence Henderson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Blinn
as 1:2025cv00014
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Grant Blinn
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Bamford et al
as 1:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Dale Bamford and Mindie L. Flemins
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Card v. Brown
as 1:2025cv00009
Plaintiff:
Tony Lamar Card
Defendant:
Nicholas W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 48 U.S.C. § 1985 Conspiracy/Deprivation Civil Rights
In the Matter of the Petition of Cabras Marine Corporation, as the Owner of the AFDL-21, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
as 1:2025cv00008
Unknown:
In the Matter of the Petition of Cabras Marine Corporation, as the Owner of the AFDL-21, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability
Petitioner:
Cabras Marine Corporation
Claimant:
Jose D. Leon Guerrero Commercial Port Authority of Guam
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Certeza v. Borja et al
as 1:2025cv00007
Plaintiff:
Julio Quenga Certeza
Defendant:
Allen Borja, Department of Corrections, Randall Cunliffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blake v. Thomas
as 1:2025cv00005
Plaintiff:
Alysia Blake
Defendant:
Houston Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
