Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 232,757
Blanton #312658 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Petitioner:
Leland Terrance Blanton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henderson v. Corona et al
as 4:2024cv04466
Defendant:
Jamie Corona and Marvin Pena
Plaintiff:
Devon Levi Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Kifah v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00856
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Ihab Nadhim Kifah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Snyder v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
James Franklin Snyder
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Witkowski v. Gootkin et al
as 6:2024cv00049
Defendant:
Core Civic, Jim Salmonsen, Brian Gootkin and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Donald Witkowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dezfooli v. Chestnut et al
as 2:2024cv01369
Respondent:
Christopher Chestnut, U.S.M.S. and USDC Hon. Richard F Boulware
Petitioner:
Meelad Dezfooli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spencer v. USA
as 1:2024cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Norman Bruce Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DelaRosa v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellenwood v. Unfred et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Defendant:
C/O Luke Unfred and C/O Allen Wilson
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Ellenwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morley v. Naphcare Medical Department
as 2:2024cv00254
Defendant:
Naphcare Medical Department
Plaintiff:
Shannon Bruce Morley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
