Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 231,157
Elghembri v. Doe, Dentist et al
as 3:2024cv02771
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohamed Elghembri
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Dentist, John Doe, Dentist and Theodore Ng
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. White et al
as 3:2024cv02773
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
Dr. White, Rachel Chen and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnamon v. Thich
as 3:2024cv02784
Plaintiff:
Todd Lee Kinnamon
Defendant:
Thich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Steadman et al
as 3:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Shadale Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Terrance Steadman, Fred Sedighi, K. Franco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Robinson v. Pettijohn
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
Gareth Warren Robinson
Respondent:
Lindy Pettijohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Benson et al
as 3:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Evan Eugene Moore
Defendant:
Joseph Benson, L. Villegas and Megan Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fischer v. State of Washington Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv05356
Plaintiff:
Jay Frank Fischer
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Truschke-Harpster v. Tuolumne County Jail
as 1:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Tammi Truschke-Harpster
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Corderick v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00546
Petitioner:
Dewayne Gage Corderick
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elghembriu v. Doe
as 3:2024cv02768
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembriu
Defendant:
Teacher Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
