Hawaii Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 1,524
Burns v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00488
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington, Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff: Nicholas Burns
Defendant: State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ciacci v. United States Probation Office
as 1:2019cv00476
Respondent: United States Probation Office
Petitioner: Michael K. Ciacci
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilroy v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00479
Plaintiff: William Gilroy
Defendant: Amy M. Murikami, Melvin H. Fujino, Clare E. Connors and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Brisken v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2019cv00475
Respondent: State of Hawaii
Interested Party: Laurie Nadamoto, Shelley Harrington
Petitioner: Jhon Brisken
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00478
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Asemani v. Islamic Republic of Iran, The
as 1:2019cv00477
Defendant: Islamic Republic of Iran, The
Plaintiff: Billy G. Asemani
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Thomas
as 1:2019cv00457
Interested Party: Laurie Nadamoto, Shelley Harrington
Respondent: Todd Thomas
Petitioner: Marshall Martinez
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. Cook, et al
as 1:2019cv00453
Defendant: Greg K. Nakamura, Maria Cook, Bradley R. Tamm
Plaintiff: Maunu Renah Williams
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington, Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: Violation of Civil Rights
Patino v. USA
as 1:2019cv00449
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Erik Patino
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Buskey v. Ching
as 1:2019cv00442
Plaintiff: Arnold Raoul Buskey
Defendant: Officer Ching
Interested Party: Laurie Nadamoto, Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?