Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 95,134
Blanton #312658 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv01823
Petitioner:
Leland Terrance Blanton
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Kifah v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2024cv00856
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Ihab Nadhim Kifah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Snyder v. Ross
as 1:2024cv00336
Petitioner:
James Franklin Snyder
Respondent:
Warden Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dezfooli v. Chestnut et al
as 2:2024cv01369
Respondent:
Christopher Chestnut, U.S.M.S. and USDC Hon. Richard F Boulware
Petitioner:
Meelad Dezfooli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DelaRosa v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden at Solano State Prison
as 3:2024cv04465
Respondent:
Warden at Solano State Prison
Petitioner:
Darrell Eugene Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blanton v. Barnes et al
as 3:2024cv01278
Defendant:
Deborah Barnes, Dana M. Sabraw, CDCR Carillo and others
Plaintiff:
Derrik Blanton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Papazian v. Trate
as 1:2024cv00851
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Morales v. Schultz
as 3:2024cv04438
Respondent:
Warden Jason Schultz
Petitioner:
Erick Morales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Fleming
as 3:2024cv04439
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Fleming
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
