Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 94,684
Legaspy Chacon v. Majors
as 3:2024cv00754
Petitioner:
Miguel Alberto Legaspy Chacon
Respondent:
Barbara Lee Majors
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tate v. Unknown
as 3:2024cv00756
Petitioner:
Lionel Tate, Sr.
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Hernandez v. Covello
as 1:2024cv00475
Petitioner:
Jose Hernandez
Respondent:
Patrick Covello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Dean v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
David Dean
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Michael Handlon v. Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc
as 2:2024cv03406
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Handlon
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Institution Lompoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Coleman v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2024cv00764
Petitioner:
Kyrel L. Coleman
Respondent:
James Dzurenda and Jeremy Bean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henke v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Greg Allen Henke
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hart v. Department of Corrections Washington State
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Joseph William Hart
Respondent:
Department of Corrections Washington State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Eytcheson v. Caternolo
as 2:2024cv00558
Petitioner:
Franklin Gene Eytcheson
Respondent:
R Caternolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rigoberto Luna Luna v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03293
Petitioner:
Rigoberto Luna Luna
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
