District Court Cases in Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Karda v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2026cv02286
Plaintiff:
George Paul Karda
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department, Lincoln Towing, Roadone Towing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hogue v. Cowlitz County
as 3:2026cv05730
Plaintiff:
Zane Hogue
Defendant:
Cowlitz County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company v. Americas Residential Inc.
as 2:2026cv02318
Plaintiff:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Defendant:
Assa Abloy Americas Residential Inc. doing business as Pfister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Bedi v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 2:2026cv02328
Plaintiff:
Balpreet Bedi
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Customs and Border Protection, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Junger v. City of Tacoma
as 3:2026cv05721
Plaintiff:
Paul Junger
Defendant:
City of Tacoma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gonzalez v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02327
Plaintiff:
Aaron Gonzalez
Defendant:
Les Schwab Tire Centers of Washington LLC and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
In re Peter C Mooney
as 2:2026rd00067
Unknown:
Peter C Mooney
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Guzman-Juarez v. Hernandez et al
as 2:2026cv01791
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
