Washington Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Foster v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05922
Plaintiff:
Laura May Foster
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Ballard v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05911
Plaintiff:
Chelsea A Ballard
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Parsons v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05917
Plaintiff:
Kelly Jean Parsons
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sanchez v. Bisignano
as 4:2026cv05134
Plaintiff:
Vanessa M Sanchez
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Houghtelling v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05909
Plaintiff:
Taryn M Houghtelling
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Clark v. Bisignano
as 4:2026cv05133
Plaintiff:
Matthew Clark
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bartman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv05910
Plaintiff:
Angelynn V. R. Bartman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Stay v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00345
Plaintiff:
Louis Victor Stay
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Maltos v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv03154
Plaintiff:
Sandra Lee Maltos
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Spivey v. Bisignano
as 2:2026cv00341
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Spivey
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
