US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 15,451
Ballantyne v. Guenther Management LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Manny Ballantyne
Defendant:
Guenther Management LLC doing business as Guenther Property Management, Victor M, Hubertus Guenther and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Stevenson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Grace Stevenson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Brendan K Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Figueroa v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Alejandro O Figueroa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Elmer Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnes v. UPS et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
UPS, UPS Beoing Field and UPS Seattle
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Barnes v. Union 174
as 2:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Darene Barnes
Defendant:
Union 174
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Gaze v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teddy Gaze
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Cole et al v. Mobilitas General Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Amanda Cole and Christopher Cole
Defendant:
Mobilitas General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Winterer v. No Named Defendant
as 2:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Jared Anthony Winterer
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.