US District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
Cases 1 - 10 of 15,536
McGary et al v. Inslee et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mr Darnell McGary and Ms Elizabeth McGary
Defendant:
Mr Jay Inslee, Susan Dryfus, Bob Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Reevis v. Eastern State Hospital et al
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
Eastern State Hospital, US District Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Suarez v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03061
Plaintiff:
Felipe Suarez
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Corby v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05043
Plaintiff:
Ricky Corby
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Matson v O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05044
Plaintiff:
Wesley A Matson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Briskey v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03060
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Briskey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Goodell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Ranee T Goodell
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reevis v. US District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Charles Joseph Reevis
Defendant:
US District Court, Spokane County Superior Court, US Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schonebaum v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Asa Lee Schonebaum
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
