District Court Cases in Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 77,107
Silbernagel v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00851
Plaintiff:
Terry Lynn Silbernagel
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Bryant v. Bryant et al
as 4:2023cv05084
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Bryant
Defendant:
Tonie Bryant and State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Koch v. City of Spokane et al
as 2:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
Mark A Koch
Defendant:
City of Spokane and Spokane International Airport
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Juarez v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03075
Plaintiff:
Sheila Marie Juarez
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Decker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv03076
Plaintiff:
Hope Caroline Decker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Kelly Mae Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Sungh Boparai v. Auburn Police Department
as 2:2023cv00825
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00841
Plaintiff:
Boys & Girls Club of King County, Mercer Island Boys Basketball Booster Club, Rebecca Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anova Applied Electronics Inc v. Inkbird Tech C L et al
as 2:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
Anova Applied Electronics Inc
Defendant:
Inkbird Tech. C.L., Mixtea360 and Dreamytenda
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
