Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 24,627
MIDDLETON v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2015cv00187
Plaintiff: KENNA MIDDLETON
Defendant: DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
USA v. 2006 Audi A4, VIN: WAUAF78E66A165756
as 1:2015cv01076
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. 211 County Road 4221, Decatur, Texas et al
as 4:2015cv00395
Cause Of Action: Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. $10,448 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2015cv00398
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $10,448 in U.S. Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN THE LEE MUNDER WEALTH PLANNING RESOURCE ACCOUNT NUMBER ***-**1080
as 1:2015cv11906
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: ALL FUNDS ON DEPOSIT IN THE LEE MUNDER WEALTH PLANNING RESOURCE ACCOUNT NUMBER ***-**1080
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture
United States of America v. Cook Personal Property, et al
as 5:2015cv00222
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Cook Personal Property,, An FNH USA, LLC FNP9 Pistol
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property - Firearm
United States of America v. $5,000.00 in U. S. Currency
as 7:2015cv00115
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: $5,000.00 in U. S. Currency
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture
United States v. $96,480.00 in United States currency
as 3:2015cv00573
Plaintiff: United States
Defendant: $96,480.00 in United States currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. The Tapestry Known as the Ambassadors of Rome Offering "The throne to Numa Pomplio"
as 1:2015cv03879
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: The Tapestry Known as the Ambassadors of Rome Offering "The throne to Numa Pomplio
Cause Of Action: a Customs Duties: Forfeiture and Other Penalties
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.