Eleventh Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 2,806
MIDDLETON v. DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
as 5:2015cv00187
Plaintiff: KENNA MIDDLETON
Defendant: DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CURRENCY
as 5:2015cv00180
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States Of America v. One Jimenez Arms Pistol, Model JA22, SN1238256, and Six Other Firearms
as 2:2015cv00059
Plaintiff: United States Of America
Defendant: One Jimenez Arms Pistol, Model JA22, SN1238256, and Six Other Firearms
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
United States of America v. Currency et al
as 2:2015cv00826
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Currency
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAMS
as 4:2015cv00262
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMIE T WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALBEE CARPENTRY LLC
as 3:2015cv00227
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALBEE CARPENTRY LLC
Cause Of Action: Occupational Safety/Health
United States of America v. TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($28,500.00)
as 0:2015cv61030
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture - currency reporting violation
United States of America v. TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($28,500.00)
as 1:2015cv21860
Defendant: TWENTY EIGHT THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($28,500.00)
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture - currency reporting violation
USA v. $2,761,910 in United States Currency
as 8:2015cv01156
Plaintiff: USA
Defendant: $2,761,910 in United States Currency
Cause Of Action: Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
In Re: $43,047.00 in U.S. Currency and Fourteen Pieces of Jewlerly Valued at $81,800.00
as 0:2015mc60970
Cause Of Action: Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000 (CAFRA)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.