Alaska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,389
Houston v. State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00158
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Petitioner:
Lovie Devon Houston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. Meritt et al
as 3:2024cv00156
Defendant:
Trey Tayler and Doug Meritt
Plaintiff:
Abraham James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Aafedt
as 3:2024cv00151
Defendant:
Dillon Andrew Aafedt
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
United States of America v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00147
Defendant:
Antoine Davis
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Abruska v. D.O.C. Alaska Medical Malpractice
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mattfi Abruska
Defendant:
D.O.C. Alaska Medical Malpractice
Shirley v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00134
Plaintiff:
Clarence C. Shirley, III
Defendant:
State of Alaska, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Katchatag v. Dahlstrom et al
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Raymond C. Katchatag
Defendant:
Nancy Dahlstrom, Jeremy Hough, A. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Newcomb v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00125
Petitioner:
Bryant Patrick Newcomb
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Baker v. State of Alaska
as 3:2024cv00120
Petitioner:
Jeramy Lee Baker
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
