District Court Cases in Alaska
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,509
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00387
Defendant:
Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beans v. Alaska Department of Corrections
as 3:2026cv00386
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Michael Mikhail Beans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Natives of Kodiak, Incorporated et al. v. Evanston Insurance Company
as 3:2026cv00381
Plaintiff:
Natives of Kodiak, Incorporated, Koman Holdings, LLC, Koman Construction, LLC and others
Defendant:
Evanston Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Chavez v. Fang et al
as 3:2026cv00383
Plaintiff:
Annie Chavez
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang and Kevin McClanahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Sebastian v. United States of America
as 3:2026cv00384
Petitioner:
George Jacob Sebastian, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lynch v. Alaska Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv00385
Plaintiff:
Kortland Lee Michael Lynch
Defendant:
Alaska Department of Corrections, Zane Nighswonger, Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Flowerdew
as 3:2026cv00382
Plaintiff:
William Odell Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Flowerdew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kvasnikoff v. City of Sand Point et al
as 3:2026cv00380
Plaintiff:
Michael Kvasnikoff
Defendant:
City of Sand Point and Jim Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
