District of Arizona Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 23,967
Goedecke #080048 v. Ende et al
as 2:2017cv01555
Plaintiff: Walter C Goedecke
Defendant: Lawrence Ende, Corizon Health Incorporated, Kelly Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Ryan et al
as 3:2017cv08094
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner: Terrance Ardell Phillips
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos-Perez v. Voyles et al
as 2:2017cv01544
Defendant: M Lando Voyles, Jason Johannes, Adrena J Astrowsky
Plaintiff: Guillermo Ramos-Perez
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01558
Petitioner: Gilbert Martinez
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Honyumptewa v. Arpaio
as 2:2017cv01553
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio
Plaintiff: Newton Clay Honyumptewa
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Dyer #271597 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01528
Petitioner: Steven William Dyer
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01552
Plaintiff: Jose Antonio Vazquez
Defendant: Paul Penzone, Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilmore v. Shartle et al
as 4:2017cv00230
Plaintiff: Errick Eugene Gilmore
Defendant: JT Shartle, Unknown Mishel, Unknown Shied and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones #190298 v. Nash et al
as 2:2017cv01547
Plaintiff: Edward Lee Jones, Jr.
Defendant: C Nash, Unknown Woods, Unknown Cao and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Crenshaw-Bruce v. Ryan et al
as 2:2017cv01556
Petitioner: Carleen Crenshaw-Bruce
Respondent: Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?