Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 1,236,744
Rush v. Calhoun
as 3:2025cv00345
Plaintiff:
Allied Rush
Defendant:
Ward Calhoun
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Odom v. Huffman et al
as 1:2025cv00139
Plaintiff:
Jerry Odom
Defendant:
Brand Huffman and Vital Core Health Strategies
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Burner et al
as 6:2025cv03127
Plaintiff:
Darius Adams
Defendant:
FNU Burner, FNU Kirby and FNU Palmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sage v. Montana Department of Corrections
as 6:2025cv00040
Petitioner:
Donald Ray Sage
Respondent:
Montana Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Jeffreys
as 8:2025cv00346
Petitioner:
Massey L. Allen, Jr.
Respondent:
Rob Jeffreys
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nixon v. Akshar et al
as 9:2025cv00608
Plaintiff:
Bryan C. Nixon
Defendant:
Frederick J. Akshar, II and Dylan J. Brunette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. F.B.O.P.
as 5:2025hc02112
Petitioner:
John G. Sanchez
Respondent:
F.B.O.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ballard v. Hunt
as 5:2025ct03112
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Luke Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ballard v. Yancey et al
as 5:2025ct03113
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Ballard
Defendant:
Tynikia Yancey, Officer Bailey and Sgt. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goulette v. DPS Prisons & Parole et al
as 5:2025ct03114
Plaintiff:
Arthur Jay Goulette
Defendant:
DPS Prisons & Parole, Warden Barnes, Captain Wester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
