Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 32,192
Mitchell v. Royal
as 16-6258
Petitioner - Appellant: ALFRED BRIAN MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee: TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
United States v. McElroy
as 16-8097
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: SHELLY LYNN MCELROY
Morris v. Dowling
as 16-5131
Petitioner - Appellant: ROSCOE LARRETT MORRIS
Respondent - Appellee: JANET DOWLING, Warden
Williams v. United States
as 16-3270
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY JAMES WILLIAMS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: COLONEL SIOBAN J. LEDWITH, Commandant, United States DIsciplinary Barracks
Stine v. Samuels
as 16-1342
Plaintiff - Appellant: MIKEAL G. STINE
Defendant - Appellee: CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Miller v. Jones, et al
as 16-6254
Plaintiff - Appellant: MARCUS RUSELL MILLER
Defendant - Appellee: JUSTIN JONES, Director for the Oklahoma Department of Corrections, MARK KNUTSON, Directors Designee, WARDEN MIKE MULLIN, Warden for the Jess Dunn Correctional Facility Oklahoma Department of corrections and others
United States v. Tinajero-Porras
as 16-6253
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JESUS ADOLFO TINAJERO-PORRAS
Johnson v. Natrona County Detention Center Administrator et al
as 2:2016cv00225
Plaintiff: Zachariah L Johnson
Defendant: Natrona County Detention Center Administrator, Jerry Clark, Natrona County Sheriff's Department Former Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Draper v. Patton
as 5:2016cv00978
Petitioner: Jamar J Draper
Respondent: Robert Patton
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Leatherwood v. Allbaugh
as 16-6251
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL D. LEATHERWOOD
Respondent - Appellee: JOE M. ALLBAUGH, Interim Director, Oklahoma Department of Corrections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?