Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 47,827
Burnham (PS) v. Babcock et al
as 1:2023cv02459
Plaintiff:
Arthur Burnham
Defendant:
Lewis T. Babcock and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortega v. Brock
as 5:2023cv03211
Plaintiff:
Ismael Deleon Ortega, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Brock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halliwell v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Phoebe Renee Halliwell
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections and Terry Tuggle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Utah Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv00655
Plaintiff:
Cedric Lamont Williams
Defendant:
Utah Department of Corrections, Brian Redd, Spencer Turley and others
Not Classified By Court:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Hansen
as 1:2023cv02454
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
Carolyn Hansen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. LNU et al
as 5:2023cv00833
Plaintiff:
Patrick Lee Adams
Defendant:
FNU LNU and Turnkey Health Clinic LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Garland, et al
as 23-1293
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK GARLAND, Atty. Gen., MICHAEL HOROWITZ, O.I.G., DEPT. OF H.H.S. and others
Burnham v. Winden, et al
as 23-1292
Petitioner / Appellant:
ARTHUR BURNHAM
Respondent / Appellee:
WINDEN and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Parnell v. White
as 23-5103
Petitioner / Appellant:
ASHLEY PARNELL
Respondent / Appellee:
TAMIKA WHITE
Abeyta v. Board of County Commissioners
as 1:2023cv00808
Plaintiff:
Timothy Patrick Abeyta
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
