Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Bennett v. Lee
as 1:2026cv00152
Petitioner:
Erin Elisabeth Bennett
Respondent:
Aaron Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Lee
as 1:2026cv00151
Petitioner:
Erin Elisabeth Bennett
Respondent:
Aaron Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Lee
as 1:2026cv00150
Petitioner:
Erin Elisabeth Bennett
Respondent:
Aaron Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Suggs v. Thurmond et al
as 6:2026cv00314
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lamont Suggs
Defendant:
Donald Thurmond and Willis Pettit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia-Olvera v. Gantt et al
as 5:2026cv02361
Petitioner:
Froilan Mejia-Olvera
Respondent:
Steven Gantt, Feclicia Hubert and Angela Baldridge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Webb v. Buchannan et al
as 6:2026cv00315
Plaintiff:
Darren Moses Webb
Defendant:
Kayla Buchannan and Board of County Commissioners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vigil (PS) v. Denver Police Department et al
as 1:2026cv04092
Plaintiff:
Norman James Vigil, Jr. and Norman Vigil, Jr.
Defendant:
Denver Police Department and Denver General Paramedics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2026cv04089
Plaintiff:
Larry Roberts
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections and Core Civic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02879
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Edwards (ID 2000062603) v. Cox et al
as 5:2026cv03326
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A. Edwards
Defendant:
(fnu) Cox, (fnu) (lnu) (1) and (fnu) (lnu) (2)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
