Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16,193
Romero-Fierro (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2025cv00464
Petitioner:
Gilberto Romero-Fierro
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woolman (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2025cv00468
Petitioner:
Aaron Kirk Woolman
Respondent:
J. F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Dresser (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2025cv00469
Petitioner:
Brandan R. Dresser
Respondent:
Warden J.F. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams (PS) v. Head of Aurora Mental Health et al
as 1:2025cv00463
Plaintiff:
Sirrlove Williams
Defendant:
Head of Aurora Mental Health and Supervisor of Aurora Mental Health the Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dimitri (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2025cv00465
Plaintiff:
Andrew Plauney Dimitri
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia (PS) v. Anderson et al
as 1:2025cv00467
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Defendant:
James Anderson, David Booth, Clark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harron (PS) v. Warden, Florence Prison Camp
as 1:2025cv00440
Petitioner:
Timothy Harron
Respondent:
Warden, Florence Prison Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wood (PS) v. Araphoe Co. Dent. Facility
as 1:2025cv00446
Plaintiff:
Douglass Wood
Defendant:
Araphoe Co. Dent. Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woolman (PS) v. USA et al
as 1:2025cv00445
Plaintiff:
Aaron Woolman
Defendant:
USA and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peters v. Feyen et al
as 1:2025cv00425
Plaintiff:
Tina Peters
Defendant:
Phillip J. Weiser
Respondent:
Sheriff John Feyen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.