Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,448
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11905
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Yut v. USA
as 1:2024cv11854
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sarath Yut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bull v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11843
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Petitioner:
Charles Bull
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brodeur v. USA Government
as 1:2024cv11803
Petitioner:
Christopher Xavier Brodeur
Respondent:
USA Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Turner v. Henacho et al
as 1:2024cv11728
Defendant:
Baldwin Henacho, Ramos, NSJ Medical Provider Wellpath and others
Plaintiff:
James A Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lugo v. Fox News Local et al
as 3:2024cv30087
Plaintiff:
Luke Lugo
Defendant:
Fox News Local, Boston Herald, Somerville Journal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vick v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2024cv11757
Petitioner:
Charlie D. Vick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 1:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 3:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dower v. George
as 1:2024cv11754
Defendant:
Plymouth Police Department and Derek George
Plaintiff:
Darius Dower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
