Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,452
Vick v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE
as 1:2024cv11757
Petitioner:
Charlie D. Vick
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 1:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schoener v. Donelan, Sheriff
as 3:2024cv11750
Respondent:
Christopher J. Donelan, Sheriff
Petitioner:
Mr. Michael Schoener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dower v. George
as 1:2024cv11754
Defendant:
Plymouth Police Department and Derek George
Plaintiff:
Darius Dower
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11728
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Acevedo v. Mici
as 1:2024cv11486
Petitioner:
Angel Acevedo
Respondent:
Carol Mici
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunlap v. F.J Bowers
as 1:2024cv11587
Respondent:
F.J Bowers and FMC Devens
Petitioner:
Cortney Dunlap
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ng v. Lizotte
as 1:2024cv11570
Petitioner:
Yat Fung Ng
Respondent:
Kenneth Lizotte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40084
Petitioner:
Glenn R. Armstrong
Respondent:
Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Frazier v. Bridgewater State Hospital
as 1:2024cv11554
Petitioner:
Jermaine Frazier
Respondent:
Bridgewater State Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
