Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,183,878
NELSON v. WARDLOW
as 4:2024cv00036
Petitioner: BILLY JOE NELSON
Respondent: JERRY WARDLOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Luther v. Chochran et al
as 1:2024cv01100
Plaintiff: Jayson Lance Luther
Defendant: Chochran, Dorton and Obion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv01681
Petitioner: DLance Chazion Anderson
Respondent: Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Galveston Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00124
Plaintiff: Roosevelt Harvey, Jr
Defendant: Galveston Police Department and Officer L. Mearlon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizondo v. State Judge of the 38th District Court et al
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff: Jaime Elizondo
Defendant: State Judge of the 38th District Court and District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Holpzapfell
as 5:2024cv00229
Petitioner: Stye Lamar Coleman
Respondent: Holpzapfell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tolliver v. Barker et al.
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff: Hiram Tolliver
Defendant: D. R. Barker, K. L. Ross, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Compton v. Conner et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff: Rodney C. Compton
Defendant: J. Conner, A. Ross and FCI-Beckley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Smith, Vance v. Matushak, Anthony
as 3:2024cv00294
Plaintiff: Vance H. Smith
Defendant: Anthony Matushak
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. USA
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner: Stephanie Barnes
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?