Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,134,893
(PC) King v. Leahy
as 1:2023cv00823
Plaintiff: Paul King
Defendant: J. Leahy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Payne v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00635
Petitioner: Terrence Keith Payne
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Chatham County Sheriffs Office et al
as 4:2023cv00143
Plaintiff: Eric Christopher Martin, Jr.
Defendant: Chatham County Sheriffs Office, Cpl. White, Dep. Salace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v. MEDICAL STAFF et al
as 5:2023cv00187
Plaintiff: WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant: MEDICAL STAFF and DOOLEY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BELLAS v. GORDON et al
as 5:2023cv00186
Plaintiff: ANTHONY LYNN BELLAS
Defendant: MICHAEL ANTHONY GORDON, DEPUTY WARDEN FLEMMINGS and RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POOLE v. FIELDER et al
as 5:2023cv00188
Plaintiff: WILLIE CLARENCE POOLE
Defendant: MS FIELDER and MS JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Daley et al
as 1:2023cv01210
Plaintiff: Sam Jones
Defendant: Michael Daley, Brad Solberg and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CROCKETT III v. WARDEN
as 2:2023cv00257
Petitioner: WILLIAM B. CROCKETT III
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHAFEEK v. WARDEN
as 1:2023cv00932
Petitioner: ATAUL SHAFEEK, JR.
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. HAMBLEN et al
as 1:2023cv00930
Plaintiff: JOHN D. SMITH, II
Defendant: LISA HAMBLEN, ARYANNA MOSS, LAURA YOUNGSTAFEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?