Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,176,969
Thompson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00239
Petitioner:
Joseph Gabriel Thompson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate/Correct Illegal Sentence
Shilling v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Ryan Joel Shilling
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ellis v. USA
as 6:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Ellis
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brannan v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Jim C Brannan
Defendant:
Mike Smith, Zachary Robinson, FNU Farrer and others
Not Yet Classified:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hansen v. Utah Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 2:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
David Hansen
Defendant:
Utah Board of Pardons and Parole, Members of the Board of Pardons and State of Utah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rosser-Burch v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Teyon Rosser-Burch
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Everich
as 3:2024cv00167
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Everich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
v. Walker, Jason et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Respondent:
Jason Walker and G. Rosenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A. et al
as 7:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Samuel Smith
Defendant:
Duffield Facility S.W.V.R.J.A., Pharmacy Nurse R. Carter and 6.6955
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frost v. Middle River Regional Jail
as 7:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frost
Defendant:
Middle River Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.