South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,023
Gregory v. Spartanburg County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv02072
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Gregory
Defendant:
Spartanburg County Jail and Spartanburg County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Rose v. Warden
as 0:2022cv02050
Petitioner:
James R. Rose
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smalls v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv02060
Petitioner:
Benjamin Smalls and Benjamin Lavon Smalls
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. USA
as 2:2022cv02047
Petitioner:
Damien Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Craft v. Fields et al
as 3:2022cv02045
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Craft
Defendant:
Deputy Matthew Fields and Deputy Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Martin v. Wellpath/Correct Care et al
as 4:2022cv02042
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Wellpath/Correct Care, Erin Gaffney, Lisa Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Martin v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions
as 4:2022cv02043
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shane Martin
Defendant:
Correct Care Recovery Solutions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Patel v. Warden
as 8:2022cv02027
Petitioner:
Sharvil Patel
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Grayson v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv02029
Plaintiff:
Antwan Dominique Grayson
Defendant:
SCDOC Lieutenant Rodney Williams and Officer Mr. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Scott v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gene Scott
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
