South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,131
Ross v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv05823
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Ross
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Parsons v. Powell
as 6:2024cv05789
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Smith Parsons
Defendant:
Kory L. Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ortiz Ortega v. Bannister et al
as 6:2024cv05790
Plaintiff:
Edwin Antonio Ortiz Ortega
Defendant:
Escoto Vavela Oscar Javier and Matthew Scott Bannister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Collins v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv05767
Defendant:
Williams, Richard Sweetenburg and Whitney Belton
Plaintiff:
Robbie Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smalls v. State of South Carolina
as 2:2024cv05632
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Smalls
Defendant:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanders v. Lewis
as 6:2024cv05633
Plaintiff:
Joshua MacKenzie Sanders
Defendant:
Hobart Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Simpson-Davis v. Anderson et al
as 5:2024cv05635
Defendant:
Joel Anderson, Stacy Richardson, Katrina King and others
Plaintiff:
Holmes Simpson-Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Tidwell v. Osorio et al
as 6:2024cv05624
Defendant:
David A Osorio and Hobart Lewis
Plaintiff:
Marlon Joe Tidwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Moore v. McMaster
as 3:2024cv05580
Defendant:
Henry D. McMaster
Plaintiff:
Richard Bernard Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Richard v. Jeffcoat et al
as 3:2024cv05553
Defendant:
F. L. Finch, Jonathan D. Jeffcoat and M. Wilsong
Plaintiff:
Paul Lewis Richard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
