South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,805
Bryan v. Cohen
as 5:2024cv02907
Petitioner:
T Terell Bryan
Respondent:
Warden Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. State
as 4:2024cv02887
Petitioner:
Bruce A. Hill and Bruce Antwain Hill
Respondent:
State and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COTE v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2024cv02859
Petitioner:
RICHARD PAUL COTE
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Murray v. Allendale Correctional Institution
as 4:2024cv02823
Petitioner:
Bryan Murray
Respondent:
Allendale Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maner v. State of South Carolina
as 8:2024cv02626
Petitioner:
Derek Maner
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Yakubu v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv02633
Petitioner:
Nuru Yakubu
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jenkins v. Warden Lavern
as 0:2024cv02636
Petitioner:
Adrian Jenkins
Respondent:
Warden Lavern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Glover v. Cohen
as 4:2024cv02635
Petitioner:
David Glover
Respondent:
Warden Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. South Carolina
as 4:2024cv02599
Petitioner:
Raekwon D.A. Wilson
Respondent:
South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. Stirling
as 0:2024cv02595
Petitioner:
Gary A. White, Jr.
Respondent:
Bryan Stirling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
