South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,919
Allsbrook v. Rhodes
as 9:2024cv06283
Petitioner:
Franklin R. Allsbrook
Respondent:
Marcus Rhodes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Rall v. Joseph
as 1:2024cv06197
Respondent:
M. V. Joseph
Petitioner:
Patrick Wyley Rall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McDonald v. Sharp, Warden
as 2:2024cv06196
Petitioner:
Marquis Spencer McDonald
Respondent:
Kenneth Sharp, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garza v. Barnes
as 0:2024cv05972
Petitioner:
Agustin Sergio Deleon Garza
Respondent:
N. Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv05973
Petitioner:
Andrew Jackson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McLean v. Wright
as 1:2024cv05979
Petitioner:
ID.#60395 Kevin Terrell McLean, Sr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv05974
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reed v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2024cv05978
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Petitioner:
Josh Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dreher v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv05952
Petitioner:
Davinne Shabaz Dreher
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Bodiford
as 8:2024cv05934
Petitioner:
Philip Scott Steele
Respondent:
Scotty R. Bodiford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.