South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,854
Pinkney v. Warden of Edgefield FCI
as 6:2024cv03868
Petitioner:
Roderick Pinkney
Respondent:
Warden of Edgefield FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCoy v. State of South Carolina, The
as 9:2024cv03808
Petitioner:
Damiane McCoy
Respondent:
State of South Carolina, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Josey v. Warden FCI Williamsburg
as 4:2024cv03779
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Josey
Respondent:
Warden FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Spady v. Janson
as 1:2024cv03790
Petitioner:
Davel Spady
Respondent:
Warden Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lisenby v. Warden of Edgefield FCI
as 5:2024cv03787
Petitioner:
Billy Lee Lisenby, Jr and Malik Al-Shabazz
Respondent:
Warden of Edgefield FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baccus v. Wilson
as 9:2024cv03744
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Alan M Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Badger v. Cohen
as 0:2024cv03717
Petitioner:
Jalen Tyrea Badger and Jalen T. Badger
Respondent:
Lavern Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oxendine v. Warden of Evans C.I.
as 2:2024cv03716
Petitioner:
Steven W. Oxendine
Respondent:
Warden of Evans C.I.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hagood v. Warden Early
as 2:2024cv03668
Petitioner:
John Allen Hagood
Respondent:
Warden Early
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Casey v. Warden of Tyger River
as 9:2024cv03653
Petitioner:
Kevin Charles Casey
Respondent:
Warden of Tyger River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
