South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 6,793
Newberry v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2024cv01678
Petitioner: Phillip D. Newberry
Respondent: South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richman v. Graham
as 9:2024cv01635
Petitioner: Ulysses Richman
Respondent: Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. South Carolina, State of
as 0:2024cv01623
Petitioner: Mickey Markell Johnson
Respondent: South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner: Otis Hosley
Respondent: Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beeman v. Janson
as 5:2024cv01622
Petitioner: Michael Steven Beeman
Respondent: Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bogan v. Warden FCI Edgefield
as 5:2024cv01624
Petitioner: Clarence Bogan
Respondent: Warden FCI Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frye v. Sterling
as 5:2024cv01585
Petitioner: Marion Wade Frye
Respondent: Bryan Sterling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn v. Janson
as 6:2024cv01544
Petitioner: George Washington Dunn
Respondent: Sean Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Loza v. Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
as 0:2024cv01492
Petitioner: Javier Gonzalez Loza
Respondent: Warden Joseph, FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Joseph
as 9:2024cv01474
Petitioner: Alonzo Tarell Jones
Respondent: Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?