South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,901
Hunter v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv04652
Petitioner:
James Hunter, II
Respondent:
Warden M Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv04580
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Conyers v. Jackson
as 6:2024cv04569
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Petitioner:
King Chevais Conyers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowers v. Mr. Graham
as 0:2024cv04525
Petitioner:
James Allen Bowers
Respondent:
Warden, Mr. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Woodbury v. James
as 0:2024cv04530
Petitioner:
Richard Allen Woodbury
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gillian v. Richland County Sheriff's Dept
as 0:2024cv04510
Respondent:
Richland County Sheriff's Dept
Petitioner:
Steven Boss Gillian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. Tolson
as 1:2024cv04432
Petitioner:
James E. Bennett
Respondent:
Sheriff Kevin R. Tolson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Patton v. Warden Edgefield Correctional Institution
as 6:2024cv04384
Respondent:
Warden Edgefield Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Alexander Patton, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Reynolds v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv04358
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Cedric Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Baccus v. State of South Carolina
as 9:2024cv04290
Petitioner:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Respondent:
Warden of Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
