South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 6,854
Lewis v. Warden Nance
as 8:2024cv02266
Petitioner:
Justin Jamal Lewis and Justin Jamal Lewis,
Respondent:
Warden Nance
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweat v. Harvey
as 1:2024cv01943
Petitioner:
Leary Sweat, Jr.
Defendant:
Director Mr. Crayman J. Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Chronister v. Wallace
as 1:2024cv01946
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Chronister
Respondent:
Terri Wallace
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright
as 9:2024cv01898
Petitioner:
Corvin J. Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Moore v. State of South Carolina
as 4:2024cv01753
Petitioner:
Charles B. Moore, Jr.
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Warden Janson
as 2:2024cv01736
Petitioner:
Malcolm Oneil Thomas and Malcolm O'Neil Thomas
Respondent:
Warden Janson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Haney v. Beckwith
as 2:2024cv01716
Petitioner:
Tron L. Haney
Respondent:
Warden Beckwith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brogdon v. Graham
as 5:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
Conell Brogdon
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Respondent:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bedford v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024cv01680
Petitioner:
Emanual Aurmond Bedford
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
