South Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 6,950
Repass v. United States of America et al
as 0:2024cv05445
Respondent:
Warden Graham
Petitioner:
Todd A. Repass
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rose v. Warden FCI Estill
as 1:2024cv05439
Respondent:
Warden FCI Estill
Petitioner:
Rodney Rose
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brunson v. South Carolina
as 2:2024cv05441
Petitioner:
Roemain Jamil Brunson
Respondent:
Warden, Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kucinski v. Warden, Broad River Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv05443
Petitioner:
David Antonio Kucinski
Respondent:
Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richbourg v. Martell
as 5:2024cv05442
Petitioner:
William G Richbourg
Respondent:
Warden Alfredo Martell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lotharp v. Joseph
as 4:2024cv05396
Petitioner:
Zannie J. Lotharp and Zannie Jay Lotharp
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones Jr. v. Joseph
as 6:2024cv05344
Respondent:
Warden M. Joseph
Petitioner:
Arthur Jones Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez v. Warden, FCI- Edgefield
as 2:2024cv05257
Petitioner:
Eduardo Martinez
Respondent:
Warden, FCI- Edgefield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Milledge v. Cohen
as 8:2024cv05201
Petitioner:
Trevin Milledge
Respondent:
Warden Laverne Cohen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv05142
Petitioner:
Pedro Lazaro Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
