Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Johnson v. Tanner
as 5:2026cv14317
Respondent:
Jeff Tanner
Petitioner:
Dorian Johnson
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Reed v. United States of America et al
as 5:2026cv00448
Defendant:
Suder, Alexander, Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
John Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Taylor v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2026cv01837
Defendant:
Responsible State / Municipal Actors and State of Tennessee
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jennings Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruviri v. Core-Civic et al.
as 4:2026cv02987
Respondent:
Lucibeth N. Mayberry and Core-Civic
Petitioner:
Sikitu Ruviri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hawkins v. Viverette et al
as 2:2026cv14321
Defendant:
Vitalcore Health Strategies, Dittmer, Osborurne and others
Plaintiff:
Dax Michael Hawkins
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Gamero v. Warden, Seneca County Jail et al.
as 3:2026cv02988
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Field Office Director, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Detroit Field Office and others
Petitioner:
Rene Gabriel Bozo Gamero
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Martinez v. Freeling
as 2:2026cv14319
Defendant:
Freling
Plaintiff:
Miguel Martinez
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cotton v. Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
as 1:2026cv01168
Respondent:
Warden, Marion Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Prince Charles Cotton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffaker v. Bradley County et al
as 1:2026cv00366
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, Bradley County Justice Center and Bradley County
Plaintiff:
Herbert Brian Huffaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
