Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100,597
Medley v. Davis
as 5:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Ian Michael Medley
Defendant:
P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv11903
Plaintiff:
Darquarion Henderson
Defendant:
Prison Medical Provider, Jeanine Ware, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Andrews #612980 v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00752
Defendant:
Unknown Smith, Unknown Gregory, Unknown Burkett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Andrews #612980
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant #403577 v. Woodgate et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Defendant:
Unknown Plumm, Unknown Woodgate, Unknown Desrochers and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Marquis Bryant #403577
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby v. USA
as 1:2024cv01260
Petitioner:
Damon Lamont Irby
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Reynolds v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01265
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Petitioner:
Maurice Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinton v. Frederick
as 5:2024cv01266
Petitioner:
Gerald E. Hinton
Respondent:
Warden George Frederick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rentas v. Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2024cv03755
Respondent:
Warden Belmont Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Juan Rentas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tyler v. Peters et al
as 3:2024cv00313
Defendant:
Chris Winslow, John Doe #1 and David Peters
Plaintiff:
Maurice Tyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawrence v. Vantell
as 3:2024cv00897
Petitioner:
Kevin Lawrence
Respondent:
Vince Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
