Sixth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29,932
v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00280
Defendant:
James W.D. Williams, IV, Jessica Andress and Miller Walker & Brush Attorneys at Law
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Traub et al
as 2:2022cv03520
Plaintiff:
Kahmayee Whitfield
Defendant:
Jeffrey Traub, Foulon Sheppard and Cory May
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Bennett v. MDOC, et al
as 22-1863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CARL BENNETT
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKSON ALLEGIANCE HOSPITAL, JOHN DOE, staff involved in surgery and others
Daniel Jones v. Kent Hendrickson, et al
as 22-5869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL H. JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
KENT HENDRICKSON, Judge, GLENN EARL ACREE, Judge, CHRISTOPHER SHEA NICKELL, Judge and others
Morris Sr. v. Huffman
as 3:2022cv00278
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
Mary K. Huffman, David Merrell, Christopher Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morris Sr. v. Turner
as 3:2022cv00279
Plaintiff:
Leon A. Morris Sr.
Defendant:
J. David Turner, Michael L. Tucker, Jeffery M. Welbaum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hammonds v. Johnson
as 1:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammonds
Defendant:
Tameka Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hammonds v. Davis
as 1:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammonds
Defendant:
Desiree Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Parris et al
as 3:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Raymond X Bailey and Ron Swain
Defendant:
Michael W Parris, Anthony Hill, Justin Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Clarke et al
as 4:2022cv00139
Plaintiff:
Freida Darlene Johnson
Defendant:
Karen Clarke, Mitch McConnell and Randal Paule
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
