Colorado Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 15,081
Pacheco v. Long
as 1:2023cv02534
Petitioner:
Jessica Jasslin Pacheco
Defendant:
Warden Ryan Long
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manalastas (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02528
Plaintiff:
Aaron N.Z. Manalastas
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinard (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2023cv02530
Plaintiff:
Kevin John Kinard
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robbins (PS) v. No Named Repondent
as 1:2023cv02529
Petitioner:
Edward D. Robbins
Respondent:
No Named Repondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dean (PS) v. Long et al
as 1:2023cv02518
Petitioner:
Charles E. Dean
Respondent:
Ryan Long and Attorney General of State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bickle (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02506
Petitioner:
Nicholas Bickle
Respondent:
J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Serrrano-Mejia (PS) v. Williams
as 1:2023cv02497
Petitioner:
Venustiano Serrrano-Mejia
Respondent:
Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Trahan (PS) v. Stancil et al
as 1:2023cv02489
Petitioner:
Codey Trahan
Respondent:
Andre Stancil and Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. State of Colorado Attorney General
as 1:2023cv02488
Defendant:
State of Colorado Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sollis (PS) v. Denver County Sheriff
as 1:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Scott Allan Sollis
Defendant:
Denver County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
