Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,000
Cox v. State of Oregon et al
as 1:2026cv02487
Defendant:
Teresa Alvarez, Oregon Youth Authority, Jonathon Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Edward Cox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Wagner et al
as 6:2026cv02466
Defendant:
Eric Chappel, Cory Hilker, Peter Turner and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Lee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
D.C. v. Bergmann et al
as 3:2026cv02467
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Thomas McLay, Thomas Jost and others
Plaintiff:
D.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Herron et al
as 2:2026cv02469
Defendant:
Sergeant R. Watson, Superintendent Ryan Legore, Stm Lieutenant L. Legore and others
Plaintiff:
Cody Raymond Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Clatsop County Sheriff- Phillips et al
as 3:2026cv02463
Defendant:
SGT T-Teague, SGT Massier, SGT Pitts and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Dantley McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gosney v. Kinnunen et al
as 6:2026cv02464
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, C. Ruby, Thomas McLay and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Allen Gosney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rowe v. Kritzer
as 6:2026cv02461
Respondent:
Kelly Kritzer
Petitioner:
High Admeril Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stark v. State of Oregon
as 3:2026cv02468
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
William H Stark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daily v. Larson et al
as 1:2026cv02465
Defendant:
John Doe and Lt. Larson
Plaintiff:
Cody Daniel Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Dieter et al
as 2:2026cv02426
Defendant:
Patrick Maney, C. Guttmann and Cindy Dieter
Plaintiff:
Paul Kay Shields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
