Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,214
Spencer v. USA
as 1:2024cv01203
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Norman Bruce Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
DelaRosa v. Fhuere
as 6:2024cv01201
Petitioner:
Anthony Michael DelaRosa
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins et al v. Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
as 6:2024cv01189
Plaintiff:
Rufus Washington, Tim Aiken, Billy Grissle and others
Defendant:
Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Krivosheenko v. Beamer et al
as 3:2024cv01179
Defendant:
Warren Roberts, State of Oregon, Leland Beamer and others
Plaintiff:
Denis Krivosheenko
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bishop v. Marion County Jail
as 6:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Travis Allan Bishop
Defendant:
Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dempsey v. Hanson
as 3:2024cv01173
Petitioner:
Troy Caje Dempsey
Respondent:
Jason Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Yates
as 2:2024cv01172
Defendant:
April Yates
Plaintiff:
Jermel A. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Templeton v. Fhuere et al
as 6:2024cv01168
Petitioner:
Mark Forest Templeton
Respondent:
Corey Fhuere and Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Multnomah County Inverness Jail
as 3:2024cv01163
Defendant:
Multnomah County Inverness Jail
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dwayne Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Capuia v. Real
as 6:2024cv01155
Defendant:
Mike A. Real
Plaintiff:
Cevelino Capuia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
