Oregon Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 10,607
Vogel v. Proctor et al
as 3:2025cv00372
Plaintiff:
Gabriel J. Vogel
Defendant:
Kathleen Proctor, Eric Butterfield and David Pitcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Abbett et al
as 2:2025cv00352
Plaintiff:
Steven Jeremy Freeman
Defendant:
Davin Abbett, Corey Fhuere, T. Buster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Champagne v. Clackamas County Courthouse
as 3:2025cv00347
Plaintiff:
Michael Champagne
Defendant:
Clackamas County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Reese et al
as 6:2025cv00361
Plaintiff:
Jon Louis Bush
Defendant:
Michael Reese, Heidi Steward, Colette Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00339
Petitioner:
Troy: Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00340
Petitioner:
Troy: Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Barr v. Linn County Jail et al
as 6:2025cv00389
Plaintiff:
Katie Marie Barr
Defendant:
Linn County Jail, Linn County Courts, Linn County DA Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dasa v. Miller
as 2:2025cv00335
Petitioner:
Satya Krishna Dasa
Respondent:
Jamie Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State of Oregon
as 3:2025cv00337
Petitioner:
Troy Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State of Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Stomberg-Tompkins v. State or Oregon
as 3:2025cv00338
Petitioner:
Troy Douglas Stomberg-Tompkins
Respondent:
State or Oregon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
