Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 80,787
SHORT v. MCCORMICK et al
as 4:2025cv00223
Plaintiff:
STEVEN W SHORT
Defendant:
RYAN ASHLEY MCCORMICK, JOSEPH A ALDREDGE, KEVIN C WELLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HREJN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2025cv00224
Plaintiff:
HARLEY HREJN, DREW RAYNE, DAVID TENNANT and others
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON and CENTURION MEDICAL GROUP PROVIDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DILLON v. SAULSBERRY
as 3:2025cv00601
Petitioner:
OSCAR DILLON, III
Respondent:
S SAULSBERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MARTIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 3:2025cv00600
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE MARTIN, JR
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, SANTA ROSA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman, Ricky v. Cruz-Gomez et al
as 1:2025cv22124
Plaintiff:
Ricky Freeman
Defendant:
R. Cruz-Gomez and Centurion of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlin v. Anderson et al
as 2:2025cv00383
Plaintiff:
Thomas Carlin
Defendant:
Jarad Anderson, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toney v. DeSantis et al
as 6:2025cv00817
Plaintiff:
Mason Trever Toney
Defendant:
Governor Ron DeSantis, Sherriff Jerry Demmings, Administrator John Polisknowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LORUSSO v. MATTHEY
as 4:2025cv00220
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Respondent:
PHILIPPE MATTHEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LORUSSO v. BARTLETT
as 4:2025cv00221
Petitioner:
MICHAEL LORUSSO
Respondent:
BRUCE BARTLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BAEZ v. DIXON
as 4:2025cv00216
Plaintiff:
JASON BAEZ
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
