Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 74,107
Hunter v. Hunter et al
as 3:2023cv00661
Plaintiff: Gervane D. Hunter
Defendant: Mark Hunter, Stev and Columbia County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gay v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00655
Plaintiff: John Gay
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blake v. Tyre et al
as 3:2023cv00660
Plaintiff: Kevin Lamar Blake
Defendant: C.A. Tyre, J. Beighley, B. Woods and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cantero Bonilla v. Lam
as 6:2023cv01036
Plaintiff: Pedro E. Cantero Bonilla
Defendant: Officer X. Lam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vann v. Tabil et al
as 2:2023cv00396
Respondent: John Doe, Tabil, Lt. Keller and others
Petitioner: Dustin L Vann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHARLES v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2023cv00233
Petitioner: KERVEN CHARLES
Defendant: SPECTOR
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA, GUZZO and FRANSOIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. STROUD et al
as 4:2023cv00235
Defendant: GARY SCOTT STROUD and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LONGO v. FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW et al
as 4:2023cv00234
Plaintiff: JOHN LONGO
Defendant: FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW, MELINDA N COONROD, RICHARD DAVISON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURPHY v. ANDREWS
as 5:2023cv00151
Plaintiff: WILLIE MURPHY
Defendant: TRACY ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ambrister v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00650
Plaintiff: Curtis Ambrister
Defendant: Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?