District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 43,096
LAWSON v. LEAVINS
as 5:2015cv00112
Plaintiff: AVION TRAMAINE LAWSON
Defendant: D LEAVINS
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Proctor v. Salisbury et al
as 3:2015cv00642
Plaintiff: Kenya Laron Proctor
Defendant: R. S. Salisbury, R. S. Davis, Unknown Negro and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Underwood v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2015cv00633
Petitioner: Woodrow Underwood
Respondent: State of Florida, Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Austin v. Union Correctional Institution
as 3:2015cv00641
Plaintiff: Timothy Austin
Defendant: Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Blome v. Broward County Sheriff et al
as 0:2015cv61083
Plaintiff: Richard Blome
Defendant: Broward County Sheriff, Sandra Sternal, Ms., Raymon Leonardo, Mr. and others
Cause Of Action: State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2015cv61082
Plaintiff: Andrew Mitchell
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections , Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGlocklin v. Blakenship et al
as 1:2015cv21930
Plaintiff: Mike McGlocklin
Defendant: Blakenship, G. Durand
Cause Of Action: State Prisoner Civil Rights
Flournoy v. Ponce et al
as 1:2015cv21932
Plaintiff: Lavictor Flournoy
Defendant: B. Ponce, S. Jackson, Javaria WIlliams
Cause Of Action: State Prisoner Civil Rights
Wegrzyn v. Mascara et al
as 2:2015cv14181
Plaintiff: Michael D. Wegrzyn
Defendant: Ken J. Mascara, Christine Smith, Jennifer C. Haga and others
Cause Of Action: State Prisoner Civil Rights
ULLAND v. COMERFORD
as 5:2015cv00111
Petitioner: GARRY ALAN ULLAND
Respondent: R COMERFORD
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.