US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 14,240
MITCHELL v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2024cv00343
Respondent:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
BRANDYN E MITCHELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WARREN v. SALISBURY
as 3:2024cv00342
Petitioner:
DELTON EUGENE WARREN
Respondent:
SHERRY SALISBURY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HEARNS v. YOUNG et al
as 4:2024cv00291
Defendant:
KEVIN GODWIN, BILLY BUCKHALT and MORRIS YOUNG
Plaintiff:
JULIUS L HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. JETTERS
as 5:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant:
JAMIE JETTERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MONTGOMERY v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
ERIC MONTGOMERY
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NASIRUN v. SAILOR et al
as 4:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
LAODE NASIRUN
Defendant:
NAOMI PARKER and LATANYA SAILOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00289
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, ROBERT GOULD, BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE ALAN WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CURRIER et al
as 3:2024cv00338
Defendant:
DEAN, TRUMBLE, LINGO and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEARNS v. DIXON et al
as 3:2024cv00339
Defendant:
SUSAN GAYE, MICHAEL GZAH and RICKY DIXON
Plaintiff:
JULIUS HEARNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TRUDEAU v. TRANSPORTAION SECURITY ADMINSITRATION
as 4:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
ALAN J TRUDEAU
Defendant:
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
