US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 14,226
LOWRIE v. MCCOLLOUGH
as 5:2024cv00138
Plaintiff: NAAFIZ K LOWRIE
Defendant: MCCOLLOUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUGGINS v. DIXON
as 1:2024cv00111
Petitioner: KINARD DONALD HUGGINS
Respondent: RICKEY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PERRY v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 1:2024cv00112
Petitioner: KEITH PERRY
Respondent: STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUDDICK v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00262
Plaintiff: GERMAINE R RUDDICK
Defendant: FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and LEON COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JAMES v. DIXON
as 3:2024cv00313
Plaintiff: DERRICK G JAMES
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTON v. JONES et al
as 5:2024cv00136
Plaintiff: RAEQWON S MOTON
Defendant: JONES, WESTBURY, DUVALL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HASTINGS v. MCNEIL
as 4:2024cv00265
Petitioner: WEAVER HASTINGS
Respondent: WALT MCNEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MURNAHAN v. MARRERO et al
as 3:2024cv00301
Petitioner: CHESTER ROBERT MURNAHAN
Respondent: TED MARRERO, HEATHER NEWMEN, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FLICK v. DIXON et al
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner: DAVID FLICK
Respondent: RICKY D DIXON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BREWER v. OKALOOSA COUNTY et al
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff: PATRICIA BREWER
Defendant: OKALOOSA COUNTY, WALTON COUNTY, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?