US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 14,226
HILL v. DU et al
as 4:2024cv00278
Plaintiff: TROY M HILL
Defendant: MITCHELL RIOS, DU, MS BASS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00325
Defendant: S DAVIS
Plaintiff: RANDY A HART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DENT v. FORD et al
as 5:2024cv00148
Defendant: RONNIE CLYDE TYNDAL, TOMMY FORD, E SWORD and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT LEON DENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLANDERS JR v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00274
Respondent: RICKY DIXON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
Petitioner: DARRELL FLANDERS JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00321
Defendant: GERENSCER, PERKINS, RICKY DIXON and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT SINCLAIR LEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENBOE v. HAGAN et al
as 3:2024cv00324
Defendant: WARD and HAGAN
Plaintiff: LARRY MIGUEL BENBOE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAPTISTE v. DIXON et al
as 4:2024cv00273
Respondent: RICKY DIXON and ASHLEY MOODY
Petitioner: PETER BAPTISTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00272
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
WATSON v. KERPSACK et al
as 3:2024cv00318
Defendant: LAJINESS and JEREMY P KERPSACK
Plaintiff: RAKIM JAMAL WATSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HYDE v. ADKINSON et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Defendant: JOHN LYONS and MICHAEL A ADKINSON, JR
Plaintiff: TRISTAN MICHAEL HYDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?