US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 35,330
Morales v. Bayonette Point Hospital et al
as 8:2021cv02518
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Morales, Jr.
Defendant:
Bayonette Point Hospital, Trauma Nurse-I.C.U., I.C.U. Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amodeo v. Director, Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2021cv00527
Petitioner:
Frank Louis Amodeo
Respondent:
Director, Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Tooks v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2021cv01749
Petitioner:
Dexter L. Tooks, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Perritt v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00529
Petitioner:
Jacob Michael Perritt
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lamm v. Wakulla Correctional Institution Annex
as 3:2021cv01076
Plaintiff:
Devin Lamm
Defendant:
Wakulla Correctional Institution Annex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harriman v. Homeway et al
as 8:2021cv02504
Plaintiff:
James Walter Harriman
Defendant:
Homeway and Starfield Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guagua v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2021cv00524
Petitioner:
Hector Guagua
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00783
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Safford v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas)
as 8:2021cv02500
Petitioner:
Willie Safford
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harriman v. Nocco
as 8:2021cv02503
Plaintiff:
James Walter Harriman
Defendant:
Christopher Nocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
