Florida Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 77,389
VOEGELE v. DIXON
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: DILLON MATHEW VOEGELE
Defendant: RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKENZIE v. CREWS
as 5:2024cv00098
Plaintiff: TABITHA MCKENZIE
Defendant: KEVIN CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. DOE et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: DENZEL EVANS
Defendant: JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff: JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant: W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant: C T HUGHES, K PERKINS, S SPEARS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medard, James v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21945
Plaintiff: James Medard
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kenley, Michael v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80645
Plaintiff: Michael S. Kenley
Defendant: Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norris Anderson, Jr. v. Broward County Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2024cv60847
Plaintiff: Norris Anderson, Jr.
Defendant: Broward County Sheriff's Office and Unknown Broward County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Doty v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 3:2024cv00514
Petitioner: Wayne C. Doty
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watson v. Duckwiler
as 3:2024cv00506
Plaintiff: Tyson Nathaniel Watson
Defendant: David Duckwiler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?